And now let us hear form Max Gross on political matters...

If anybody out there wants to take any bets on the 2012 election, I'm willing to take Barack Obama.

This comes after multiple people I know (all of whom are educated on political matters) have said to me that they are very worried about President Obama's chances for reelection in 2012.

"I don't think he's got it sewn up at all," one friend of mine said to me recently.

"He doesn't have a chance in hell of getting reelected," said my father.

Well, my father's never correct on these matters -- so I'm not worried.

And, yes, I will admit that the President has had a rough couple of months. There are any number of mistakes President Obama could make that would sink his reelection. And I'm not convinced that he will win the overwhelming victory he won in 2008. He's going to have to work like hell to keep those GOP-tilting states like Florida, Ohio, Virginia and Indiana in his column. But Obama has one big advantage that I think will push him over the finish line:

The Republicans don't have a credible alternative.

Let's recall his potential challengers:

Mitt Romney. At this point, my money is on the Mittster to get the nomination. The GOP has a tendency to reward strong second placers in the next cycle, and while Mike Huckabee was technically second place in 2008, the Mittster is doing his best to make everybody think this was not the case.

I also think that given the fact that Romney is a reasonably smart guy, and a somewhat competent governor, he would probably be the GOP's wisest and most credible alternative. (He would also be the most responsible pick... Like that matters.) But Romney has, in my mind, at least three fatal flaws.

1) His Mormonism.

It's a shame that this should count against him -- but it does. (I don't think it's a total disqualifier, but he's going to need every last vote in 2012 and this will harm him.)

2) Health care.

The Mittster's Massachusetts health care bill was essentially the blueprint for Obamacare. This means he is going to have to face a choice -- attack his own stewardship as governor, or cede the healthcare debate to Obama. Either way, Mitt is screwed.

3) He is the most transparently phony politician I've ever seen.

I actually think phoniness shouldn't be a disqualifier in and of itself. (I remain proud of my 2004 vote for John Kerry.) But when half of your own party thinks you're a shameless panderer, you're in big trouble.

Sarah Palin. There's a part of this old Democrat that lies in bed at night with visions of Sarah Palin winning the nomination dancing in his head... Because if she is the nominee, as Daniel Larison recently predicted, Obama wins a 1984-level landslide.

Palin has great appeal to the fringe right -- and no appeal to anyone else.

While Rich Lowry might feel his heart going pitter pat every time she speaks, the majority of the country thinks she's a bubble headed moron, who couldn't finish out a single term as governor and couldn't handle an interview with Katie Couric. I know numerous right wing Republicans who agree with her on every issue -- and yet can't stand the fact that she's the face of their movement. "She's right," someone I know who was active in the GOP said to me, "but she doesn't know why she's right -- and that worries me."

Mike Huckabee. Yet another 49 state triumph for President Obama.

The New Yorker had a piece a week or two ago saying that he was the frontrunner -- to which my response is: get real.

Mike Huckabee has one thing going for him: He's by far the most likable candidate that the GOP has right now. But every time Huckabee talks about something substantive, he winds up on the scary extreme of an issue. (Fair tax? Really?) Or he invokes God in a way that would make George W. Bush blush. (He once credited divine intervention with his improving poll numbers.)

Yes, we might want a nice guy as our pastor. But do we trust him with America's economy? With wars in Iraq and Afghanistan? With serious problems like climate change and immigration? I think the answer would be a resounding no.

Tim Pawlenty. This would be the GOP equivalent of nominating John Kerry. He's a lot less crazy than Palin or Huckabee. But he is so lukewarm that very few people would be filling the streets to elect him president. There was a reason that John McCain didn't pick him to be his running mate.

I don't think Bobby Jindal is ready for prime time yet. Likewise, I think Scott Brown is, as of right now, no real threat. It's one thing to do very well in a special election, but to start running for president he'd have to do so in early 2011 and I just don't think he has spent enough time in the spotlight for that. (Although, similar things were said about President Obama -- so you never know.) The one candidacy that truly worries me is that of David Petraeus. It looks to me like Petraeus isn't very interested in running (and Obama might have neutralized this threat by asking him to take control of Afghanistan -- which might have been his greatest political trick yet) but if Petraeus turns around Afghanistan and announces his retirement next year, then President Obama should be worried. Otherwise, I think he just has to sit back and watch the GOP immolate itself.

Victory! With an assist from... Scott Brown?

Well, it took way longer than it should have. It was a messy, arduous, endless process. But, at the end of the day, what will probably be the greatest social legislation of my lifetime will be signed into law by President Obama tomorrow.

Hallelujah!

Had the bill failed, it would have proven that Congress and the Democratic party were so dysfunctional that they couldn't enact their agenda even with overwhelming majorities. All the caricatures about Democratic fecklessness would have felt eerily true. Obama would have probably taken a page from Bill Clinton and spent the next three years putting out small fires and following a very incrementalist approach.

Moreover, the Republicans would be riding the wave of their own political moxie. They would have bluffed their way out of what should by all reasonable accounts have been considered an unplayable hand. It would have been a huge victory for them.

Thankfully, we were spared all of that. And I think that the Democrats actually owe some thanks to the man who almost torpedoed the effort: Scott Brown.

By the time Brown was elected, the plan (and to a certain extent, the Obama presidency) was flailing. Some of the provisions of the healthcare bill (particularly Ben Nelson's Nebraska kickback) had left an extremely unsavory taste in the public's mouth. Some on the left were grumpily insisting that it would be better to vote it down and get a single-payer system. And the right was gaining momentum by saying that Obama was out of touch.

Yes, healthcare probably would have passed. But nobody would have felt good about it.

But now everybody suddenly feels great about it. Why?

Well, for a few reasons, I think.

The Brown victory definitely focused the mind of the administration. Instead of taking a hands off approach, the White House knew they had to be proactive. They had to change the public's mind and it would take a lot of work. Suddenly you have Obama going through policy details with his opponents and shooting down the GOP's more ridiculous suggestions. (And, in the process, taking much of the zing out of their biggest lies.)

Moreover, the left realized that the electoral tide was turning against them. Anyone with any brains realized they'd never get a chance like this again, and that it was better to just fall into line and get this thing passed. It's one thing to hold out for a better deal when one is still possible. It's another to lose a sure thing. (And a Massachusetts senate seat is as close to a sure thing as the Democratic party gets. Suddenly, anything looked possible.)

And, fortunately, by the time Brown was elected the legislative die had pretty much already been cast. There was no real hurdles that the Republicans could throw up that could stop this legislation, unless Democrats decided to become complicit in their own suicide.

It almost worked.

The Republicans scared the ever living shit out of Democrats. Many arms had to be twisted and spines stiffened. And, until yesterday, everybody was holding their breath. (When Stupak signed on and the bill was pretty much assured passage, my father and I opened up a bottle of champagne -- much to my mother's horror. She thought that we were jinxing it. Knowing past Democratic behavior, it was not an unreasonable fear.)

But the most interesting thing that the Brown victory did was give the Republicans an early boost of adrenaline -- which caused them to peak way too early.

By last week, Republicans seemed to have gotten so wrapped up in their talking points -- that it would be political suicide for the Democrats to pass the bill, that Scott Brown was the will of the people, that the bill was dead -- that they themselves really believed it.

After all, they had won the governorships in New Jersey and Virginia and a senate seat in Massachusetts, for chrissake!

But, the fact is, that the bill wasn't dead. Far from it.

There was a big question as to whether the Democrats would have the nerve to cave or pass. Nobody quite knew. But they always had to tools to make this bill law. And the drama of this whole thing -- the near defeat, and come from behind victory -- made victory a lot sweeter.

Now, after the vote is safely over, the Republican pronouncements seem a little shrill. And now that they're not pounding their podiums they look somewhat slayable. And Democrats seem a lot more energized than if a silly party hack like Martha Coakley had simply taken her seat. The bill would have passed without nearly the amount of enthusiasm it has now.

For all of that, we have Scott Brown to thank.

But, in any event, this is a great day. President Obama is the real thing. A true ninja master. Open your own bottle of champagne!

Take it away, Kool and the Gang: